- InputArena – Compare Mouse & Keyboard
- All Gadgets
- Compare
- LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K vs LAMZU MAYA X
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K vs LAMZU MAYA X
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K vs LAMZU MAYA X
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K vs LAMZU MAYA X is mainly a choice between hand feel, wireless performance and everyday practicality rather than just the higher number on the spec sheet. Use this comparison to decide which mouse better matches your grip style, desk setup and sensitivity preference. The important checks are shape, weight balance, sensor/DPI range, polling support, button layout, battery claims and whether the included receiver or software matches your system. The imported comparison notes highlight: LAMZU Atlantis OG V2 4K vs Maya X: Detailed comparison of specs, 57g vs 47g weights, PAW3395 vs PAW3950 sensors, 4K vs 8K polling. Find the best lightweight gaming mouse for claw grip precision.
⚖️ Key Differences
- LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K should be judged first on comfort, shell size and whether its weight feels stable for your grip.
- LAMZU MAYA X should be judged on whether its shape or upgraded feature set gives a real advantage for your daily use.
- Performance differences matter most for gaming: compare sensor class, DPI ceiling, polling rate support and wireless receiver requirements.
- For office or casual use, click feel, noise, battery life and plug-and-play reliability can be more important than maximum DPI.
- Before buying, confirm the exact regional bundle because some high-polling mice need a separate 4K or 8K dongle.
| LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K – Full specification | LAMZU MAYA X – Full specification | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Price | $100.00 | $118.95 |
| Our Rating | ||
| Brand | lamzu | lamzu |
| Category | Mouse | Mouse |
| Basic Information | ||
| Brand | LAMZU | LAMZU |
| Model Name | ATLANTIS OG V2 4K | MAYA X |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Category | Mouse | Mouse |
| Grip Style | Palm, Claw | Palm, Claw, Fingertip |
| Ergonomics | Right-handed | Symmetrical (Ambidextrous) |
| Design Type | Gaming | Ultra-lightweight |
| Color Options | Black, Charcoal Black | Purple Shadow, Light Pink, Charcoal Black, White, Cloud Gray |
| Dimensions & Weight | ||
| Length | 123 mm | 124 mm |
| Width | 66 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 38 mm | 40 mm |
| Weight | 57 g | 47 g |
| Material | Matte-textured ABS plastic | Matte dry-grip plastic shell |
| Feet Material | PTFE (Low Friction) | PTFE (replacement feet included) |
| Sensor & Performance | ||
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Sensor Model | PixArt PAW3395 | PixArt PAW3950 |
| Resolution (DPI) | 100 – 26,000 DPI | 100 – 30,000 DPI (adjustable) |
| Tracking Accuracy | Flawless (Zero smoothing / acceleration) | Flawless (Zero smoothing / filtering / acceleration) |
| Polling Rate | 4000 Hz | Up to 8000 Hz (0.125 ms) |
| Max Tracking Speed | 650 IPS | 750 IPS |
| Max Acceleration | 50 G | 50 G |
| Lift-off Distance | 1–2 mm (adjustable) | Adjustable (via software) |
| Click Latency | < 1 ms | ~1.0 ms (8000 Hz) |
| Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
| Switches & Buttons | ||
| Switch Type | Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot | Omron Optical Microswitches |
| Durability | Up to 80M clicks (typical) | 70+ Million clicks |
| Total Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Scroll Wheel | TTC Silver Encoder | Rubberized notched wheel |
| Side Buttons | 2 (customizable) | Customizable (2 per side) |
| Middle Click | Yes | Yes |
| Macro Support | Yes (LAMZU software) | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connection Type | Wireless (2.4 GHz) / Wired | Wireless (2.4 GHz) / Wired |
| Cable Length | 1.8 m | 1.8 m |
| Cable Type | Paracord USB-C | Flexible paracord USB-C |
| Wireless Receiver | 4K Nano Dongle (USB-A) | 8K Nano Dongle (included) |
| Charging Port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Compatibility | Windows 10/11, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Compatibility | ||
| Software | LAMZU Web-based Configurator | LAMZU Aurora (web-based) |
| System Support | Windows 10/11, macOS, Linux | Windows 10/11, macOS 11+ (limited) |
| Interface Required | USB-A port | USB-A (dongle), USB-C (charging) |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery Type | Built-in Lithium Polymer | 250 mAh Lithium Polymer |
| Battery Life | Up to 80 hours | ~80h (1000 Hz) / ~20h (8000 Hz) |
| Charging Method | USB-C wired charging | USB-C wired charging |
| Charge Time | Approx. 2 hours | ~1 hour |
| Smart Features | ||
| Smart Features |
Onboard DPI switching Nordic 52840 MCU 4K wireless polling rate Firmware updates supported Web-based macro programming |
Onboard DPI switching Ultra-low latency 8000 Hz wireless Competitive Mode (higher performance) Web-based Aurora software Framework baseplate open design Status LED indicators No RGB lighting |
🧾 Side-by-Side Buying Summary
Choose LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K if you prefer its shape, size and feature balance over chasing every possible upgrade. It is the safer pick when its grip profile already matches your hand and the price is clearly lower than LAMZU MAYA X.
Choose LAMZU MAYA X if its upgraded sensor, polling, battery, RGB or ergonomics match the way you actually use a mouse. It makes more sense when the extra features are included in the bundle, not sold separately.
Both models should be compared in real terms: comfort after long sessions, stable wireless connection, switch feel and the exact price available in your region. Do not buy only from the DPI headline.
⚡ Performance Comparison
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K is best evaluated by tracking consistency, latency mode and whether its sensor settings are easy to control. If it already offers enough DPI/polling for your games, it can feel just as practical as the more expensive option.
LAMZU MAYA X becomes the stronger performance pick only when its sensor, polling rate or firmware options are genuinely higher and supported by the included receiver. Otherwise, the difference may be small in normal desktop use.
For competitive gaming, check 57g, 47g, PAW3395, PAW3950. For normal productivity, any stable modern sensor is usually enough, so comfort and battery life become the deciding factors.
🧩 Design & Build Comparison
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K should suit buyers who like its hand position, side shape and weight distribution. A lighter mouse can feel faster, but a slightly larger shell may be more comfortable for palm or relaxed claw grip.
LAMZU MAYA X should suit buyers who want a different shell feel, more grip security or a more feature-rich body. The better design is the one that reduces finger strain and keeps aim consistent over time.
Mouse design cannot be judged from specs alone. Compare length, hump position, side curvature, button height and weight. If possible, match the dimensions to a mouse you already find comfortable.
🔌 Connectivity / Compatibility Notes
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K is the better choice if its wireless mode is simple, stable and does not require extra setup. For work laptops, receiver storage and quick pairing are practical advantages.
LAMZU MAYA X is better if it offers more flexible wireless modes, higher polling support or easier software control. Make sure those modes work on your PC or console before paying extra.
Check whether the box includes a USB receiver, USB-C cable, extender or high-polling dongle. Also confirm software support for DPI stages, debounce, lift-off distance and button remapping.
👥 Who Should Choose Which?
- You want the lower-cost option and LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K already has enough performance for your games or work.
- Your priority is comfort, battery life and simple setup instead of the highest polling number.
- You prefer its size or shape based on your hand length and grip style.
- You do not want to depend on extra dongles or complex software settings.
- You want the stronger feature set from LAMZU MAYA X and the price difference is reasonable.
- You play fast shooters where sensor tuning, polling rate and low weight can matter.
- You specifically need its shape, RGB, button layout or wireless mode.
- You have confirmed that the required receiver and software support are included.
🛒 Practical Buying Advice
Buy the model that fits your hand first, then compare performance. A mouse with perfect specs but the wrong shape will feel worse than a cheaper model that fits correctly. For LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K and LAMZU MAYA X, verify the actual weight, sensor version, polling dongle, warranty and return policy from the seller page. If prices are close, choose the model with better wireless headroom; if there is a big gap, choose the one that already covers your DPI, battery and grip needs.
🏆 Winner by Use Case
LAMZU MAYA X — choose it if the higher polling or sensor package is confirmed in the box.
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K — choose it if it is cheaper and comfortable for long sessions.
LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K — pick the simpler, easier-to-carry option if portability matters.
whichever model is cheaper by a clear margin — comfort and warranty matter more than small spec gaps.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Is LAMZU MAYA X automatically better than LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K?
Not always. It is better only if its shape, wireless mode and performance features match your use case.
Which one should I choose for gaming?
Choose the model with the better sensor and polling support only after confirming that the required dongle and software are included.
What should I verify before buying either mouse?
Check exact weight, dimensions, receiver type, battery claim, switch type, warranty and return policy.
Does higher DPI make a mouse better?
No. DPI headroom is useful, but tracking quality, latency, shape and stability matter more in real use.
🏁 Final Verdict
The practical winner depends on price and hand fit. Pick LAMZU MAYA X if you clearly need its stronger gaming features or more advanced wireless package. Pick LAMZU ATLANTIS OG V2 4K if it is more affordable and already matches your grip, battery and sensor needs. For most buyers, the better mouse is the one that feels controlled after two hours, not the one with the biggest number on the box.
✅ Source / Verification Notes
- Manual guide data is stored in the APS comparison guide meta fields, not only in post content.
- Use the product pages and seller listing to verify final specs, price, included accessories and regional variants before publishing.
- This text avoids lab-test claims unless those claims are present in your own product data or verified source notes.